Stem cell research has raised several concerns across the world in terms of ethical issues. There are those who actively support the idea and those against it. Ethical issues raised by different groups at the social, political and economic levels tend to discourage such methods towards supporting different aspect of life in terms of stem cell research. The field has been subjected to several moral concerns by the opposing figures to the extent that different laws are developed to secure the position of proponents in the same area.
Some of the reasons used to support the research tend to avoid the ethical and moral issues that come with the adoption of new science approaches. It is suggested that stem cell research improves the capability of doctors to understand how several diseases and conditions occur and impact the human body. It is possible through the observation of the established stem cell developing into other cells like heart muscles, bones and nerves under controlled environment. The findings will equip the medical field with a precautionary approach towards tackling certain medical problems. What is more, as a moral belief to secure and cherish human life, stem cell research can support such ideas through the research methods.
Regenerative medicine is another scientific explanation that can outshine the ethical and moral concerns surrounding stem cell research. It technically means that the doctors will have an opportunity to generate or develop healthy cells that can be used to replace those observed to be posing a risk or danger to a human body. The regenerative process will ensure that a specific stem cell is guided to grow into a unique cell and targeted at a ruptured nerve or tissue to cure it. The science behind such an approach will counter the negative moral pressure related to the field in the area of creation. The scientist must be understood not to try to compete with God in his work but as a tool of elongating the good works of the Creator through securing the health of His creature. Beneficiaries of such a process like spinal cord injury patients, heart disease patients, and stroke and cancer patients, all require a second chance to enjoy life opportunities. Denying the operations of such researches on the basis of morality will essentially mean hindering a second chance to such patients, which is a deviation from ethical and moral beliefs in itself.
Another reason for departing from moral and ethical reasons is the chance in testing a new product in the medical field. Researchers have the challenge of producing medicine that can function properly and cure human diseases. It can only be possible through proper stem cell experiments in relation to neurobiology science. For drugs to function properly, it must be concrete upon conclusive data analysis with concrete results. These steps are not unethical and immoral as adjudicated by groups fighting stem cell researches. It must be noted that the activity is voluntary upon signing documents of compliance to all possible human conditions. The willingness of a person signs out any hindrance of ethical and moral stands. The companies involved do not force people but elect to advertise as a manner of willing buyer and willing seller conditions. The freedom to determine what one’s cells will be used for to their final extent as per regulations also set the bar for morals and ethical concerns being put into consideration.
In conclusion, it must be understood that the steps taken through the stem cell research are meant for the benefit of the general public. Companies have the mandate to develop proper steps and results that are morally and ethically beneficial to the society.
Earn 10% from every order!
Earn money today! Refer our service to your friends