Character vs. Conduct in Politics

Politics is a complicated science of manipulating thousands of people. Its success depends not only on the program of country development but also on the leader personality. Thus, it is important to find out what is more important in politics: character or conduct?

A good example when conduct is essential is Kim Jong Un, a young Korean leader. By the end of 2012, North Korea joined the club of space powers and violated two UN Security Council resolutions by successfully conducting the third nuclear test in the history. UN Security Council considered this action as ignorance of the resolutions and promised to harden sanctions against the North Korean regime. In response to this decision, Kim Jong Un declared about a possible preventive nuclear attack on the United States. Soon after, on March 8, 2013, the leadership of North Korea canceled the nonaggression pact with South Korea, signed in 1953 by the end of the Korean War.

Margaret Thatcher is an example of strong character in politics. She was the first female Prime Minister in the history of Great Britain and the whole world. Her strong character and steadiness to compromise created a famous joke that she was ‘the best man’ in the British Parliament. Moreover, she became a real inspiration for thousands of men and women all across the globe as a symbol of strong personality. She was able to stand aggressiveness and implement right decisions even if she had to sacrifice other important aspects in her life.

Thus, the practice shows that character in politics is as important as conduct. Character in relation to personal behavior allows withstanding emotional attacks and taking decisions based on personal experience. At the meantime conduct gives an opportunity to build and implement effective strategy within the country and in international relations. Character and conduct should be balanced; in this case they work best.

Earn 10% from every order!

Earn money today! Refer our service to your friends