In the synthesis of "A Chinese Banquet" by Kitty Tsui, there is a depiction of the tribulations of a Chinese lesbian in a Chinese family setting bearing in mind that the plot is set in the United States of America. The poet gives her reaction to the relationship between lesbians, in which one of the lesbians is invited for a party amid constraints of separation from the other partner. This is deliberately situated to separate the lesbians from meeting in the party due to the consideration that marriage of the same sexes is an omen. The setting of the poem depends on the outcomes of contravention with the Chinese culture. This is from the consideration that the life of gay marriage contravenes the societal norms of the Chinese culture. The aspect of a family is considered to be strong, which puts a form of conflict with the life of the same sexes, in which childbearing does not form the basic concept. This implies that the life of gays does not give rise to the continuity of the family, which contravenes the perception of the family.
The poet displays her situation as a source of the attack on the discriminatory considerations directed towards same-sex marriages. For instance, “Mother, you love a man. I love a woman.” This implies the mother has to understand that her destiny lies in the love of a different-sex marriage, while the contender should be left with the freedom of her choice. Consequently, the poem is pegged on a repetitive meter and rhythm, which provides the platform for the stress of the ideologies. For instance, “tell her: mother I’m gay, mother I’m gay and so happy.” This is used to show how the author stresses the life of the lesbian, while the interpretations therein form the essence of this appears. By consideration, “behaviorists focus on the behavior-environment relations and analyze overt and covert behavior as a function of an organism interacting with its environment (Barnet, 2005, p. 285).”
The author interpreted the material in the way she did because her rights of freedom to the expression of relationships were contravened. The author explains her situation of being lesbian as being a right by choice since she does not see the reason for the separation from her lesbian counterpart in the party. Her life is full of tribulations since she has the jurisdiction of protecting her identity as a lesbian. For instance, after the confrontation with her mother, she defends herself claiming that she is a lesbian by choice, just as her mother chose not to be. For instance, “Mother, you love a man. I love a woman.” The author believes that she has a right to expression of her identity as a lesbian and the conditions of the party should have taken heed to the invitation of her lesbian counterpart as a form of recognition of this choice of life. In general, the author in “life of a banquet” shows her fury over the life of the discrimination of the gay. By consideration, although she is aware of the informality of the situation, she is unconscious of the banquette concerning her life. In this regard, the author is the notion of contention with the issue of organizing a family banquet amid constraints of discrimination based on the lifestyle (Barnet, 2005, p. 284).
On the other hand, the author had to interpret the material in the way she did because she felt lonely during the banquet. This is from the fact that a family banquet is a noble event according to Chinese customs since it is a form of gathering for sharing happiness. This implies that participants should be allowed to express their forms of happiness through equal representation. If one of the members is not allowed to attend such functions, the practical meaning would have been contravened. in this regard, the action of secluding the lesbian partner was a source of lament for the author, who had no one with a similar view in life, which heightened her proximity to loneliness. Moreover, all the participants in this event could not interpret the life of a lesbian as being ethical. This group of participants forms the scope of the behaviorists, who believe in the study of the covert and that of private events. Such events should be in the favor of satisfaction of the participants. On the converse, deviations from the meaning of such events might bear varied reactions with some grooming contempt. This shows that with the level of discrimination directed towards the lesbian participant, there was a probable foundation for breeding loneliness, which is also a cause for varied consequences. For instance, the speaker, “suck on the shrimp and squab, dreaming of the cloudscape in your eyes.” This shows that the speaker did not give the event full attention, but had to keep thinking about her lesbian counterpart (Barnet, 2005, p. 284).
Besides, the author had to react in the way she did since she is a protagonist. By consideration, the speaker argues for the union between members of the same sex with the full knowledge of the implications therein. In this regard, the author had prior knowledge that gay marriage is against the customs of the Chinese culture. Being part of such a community, the author had the duty to live within this mandate. However, due to the protagonist's attributes, her choice leads her to the contravention with the norms. This contravention forms the source of conflict, which puts her at a crossroads with the other members of the society. Such contraventions have varied outcomes, one of which is the misinterpretation of functions such as that of the banquet. It is absurd that a contender in her understanding has the jurisdiction of choosing what is in contravention with the societal norms. This implies that the author shows that her happiness does not lie in the norms of the society but the freedom of choice of the best life according to how one interprets happiness (Barnet, 2005, p. 285).
The poem is important since the poet is not only writing the love letter to her lesbian friend but also providing a platform for a view of her voice. The author is the voice of advocacy of the rights of the gay. This is through the depiction of the ideology of psychology, in which it is evident that the author is fighting for a consensus on the issue of gay marriage. By consideration, she attacks the discrimination against gay marriage and wants to rebuild her relationship with her family. The author is in contention with the ideology that she has the capability of rebuilding her relationship with the family without destroying her choice of a lesbian partner. This implies that the poet has a vision of overseeing through the process of mediation of ties with her family without needing to change her identity as a lesbian. This implies that she defends the identity of choices such as that of being gay (Barnet, 2005, p. 284).
The overall argument is that the behavior of an individual is largely affected by the environment within reach, while the choice depends on an individual. This is in contention with the controversy behind a poet who is willing to adore both situations of contravention with societal norms without loss of touch with family happiness.
Earn 10% from every order!
Earn money today! Refer our service to your friends